RSAC Security Scholar Poster Pitch-Off
summary
Four brief research pitches cover concrete results: a Carnegie Mellon survey (24 valid responses) finds 70% start CTFs to learn while 71% cited lack of representation among those who quit, pointing to mentorship and team formation fixes; a TEMPS framework creates TEMPS metrics and an OODA-based instantiation for cyber-kinetic planning with a planned proof‑of‑concept tool; smishing analysis compares 96 English vs 23 Spanish samples, showing afternoon/evening bursts and English attackers using more enticements; an EFB study recreated ADS‑B protocol to crash an iOS flight app — vendor patches confirmed.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introducing Security Scholar program
- 2:54Diversity in CTF competitions
- 12:13TEMPS cyber operations framework
- 22:57Smishing strategies across languages
- 35:15Aviation cyber security in EFBs
- 46:17Closing remarks and Q&A
related talks
47mRSAC Security Scholar Poster Pitch-Off
05mLightning Talk: Lessons Learned from the Embedded Capture-the-Flag (eCTF) competitions
10mShort: Unencrypted Flying Objects: Security Lessons from University Small...
46mRSAC Launch Pad
54mHacked in hours: Red team assessments unveiling vulnerabilities
26mTopics of Interest: These are the Vulns You are Looking For: AppSec Champions & Jedi...
01h 11m2024 Security BSides // Adam Pennington
28mThe Path to Infosec is Not Always Linear