AI: Law, Policy and Common Sense Suggestions on How to Stay Out of Trouble
summary
Federal and state regulators treat AI as existing law applied to new tools, citing FTC settlements that force companies to delete models trained on unlawful data and carry penalties; EU drafts an AI Act with prohibited uses and 6% global‑revenue fines for high‑risk systems; NIST issues a four‑part risk framework (governance, mapping, measuring, management); public polls show ~73% fear job loss and ~55% favor a federal AI agency; practical steps are four governance pillars and an AI impact assessment plus supplier clauses and a proposed data sheet for datasets to document provenance and limits.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (12)
- 0:00Start
- 4:34Legislative Definitions
- 6:11The Dilemma
- 11:16Risks
- 18:31Al Blueprint - White House statement
- 19:08Executive Action
- 25:20NIST AI Risk Management Framework (1.0)
- 28:59Prohibited Uses
- 29:49High-Risk Systems
- 30:28"Foundation" Models
- 31:42Four pillars of artificial intelligence governance
- 38:49What to do? (the "Apply" Slides)
related talks
01h 00mAI: Law, Policy, and Common Sense Suggestions to Stay Out of Trouble
40mAI: Legal and Policy Considerations and Landmines to Avoid
51mAI: Legal and Policy Considerations and Landmines to Avoid
36mResponsible AI: In Theory, Practice, and Policies
31mPanel: Navigating the AI Policy Landscape
01h 19mPower, Convenience, and Prestige in the Governance and Legal Regulation of AI
28mAI Act - What is important to know from a developers perspective?
17mAI Law & Ethics: developing responsible AI systems