Cloud-Enabling the Electric Grid with Consequence Driven Approaches
summary
The DOE–lab project produces a Ciruss framework and an online assessment that scores 11 consequence types, generates RFP-ready questions and a radar maturity report, and recommends engineering fixes (example: add a $20 pump time delay) instead of only cyber overlays. It benchmarks ADMS, ranks latency-sensitive control as high consequence, cites $20.5B Grid Deployment funding and real incidents (220 MW TV-driven swing; tornado-washed servers), and offers lighthouse projects and technical assistance to de-risk cloud adoption.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:26Why grid is digital
- 6:22Grid reliability and security
- 12:21Digital transformation in sector
- 14:44Cloud systems in utilities
- 20:01Ciruss cloud framework
- 26:28Consequence assessment
- 36:14Outputs and next steps
- 38:21Key takeaways
- 39:03Q&A on OT cloud
- 42:36Vendor cloud migration
related talks
28mCloud Computing for the Power Grid: From Service Composition to Assured Clouds
28mFireside Chat: Advancing Digital Grids – Lessons From Utilities in E...
29mConduit Power, Hitachi Energy enable grid modernization through Cloud SCADA
30mDigital Sovereignty and Grid Resilience: The Strategic Role of LF Energy and...
34mIs the Power Grid a Huge Cybersecurity Risk?
21mCritical infrastructure and IoT: How to harden what you can’t replace
29mHow Can Energy Systems Be Protected from Cyberattacks and Blackouts?
30mForced Digital Transformation and the Realities to ICS/OT Cybersecurity