Avoiding Legal Landmines: A Review of Recent Cyber Cases
summary
Merck’s NotPetya loss leads to an insurer fight over a $1.4 billion claim and a court ruling that warlike exclusions don’t automatically bar cyber loss, followed by an undisclosed settlement; a GitHub/Microsoft suit over missing copyright metadata (DMCA 1202b) is dismissed for lack of exact-copy claims; a geo‑fence warrant covering six sites yields eight device leads but convictions are overturned for overbreadth; courts and regulators target post‑fact bug bounty authorization practices, CEO consent decrees, and public‑disclosure duties (SolarWinds).
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Welcome
- 1:55Law in cybersecurity
- 2:16Merck vs ACE case
- 8:45AI case and GitHub dispute
- 14:36Geo-fence warrants and Fourth Amendment
- 24:10Uber obstruction case appeal
- 32:04FTC vs CEOs like Drizly
- 38:09SolarWinds SEC enforcement
- 46:46Relentless vs Commerce and Chevron
- 49:21Missouri vs Biden rulings
- 50:07Key takeaways
related talks
01h 00mMaster Class ICT: A Cyber Case Law Review 2021
42mNew Legal & Regulatory Developments Impacting the IT Professional Community
36mCybersecurity, Privacy and Data Security from a Business Lawyer's Perspective
49mWhat Have the Courts Done Now? Explaining the Impact of Recent Cyber Cases
51mTen Legal Issues for CISOs
52mCISO Legal Risks and Liabilities
49mPlaying With Fire? The Latest Cyber Law Hot Topics
49mTake a Walk on the Wild Side: Cyber Insurance Claims Trends