Auditory, Visual, or Both? Comparing Visual and Auditory Representations of Game Elements in a Ga...
summary
Custom tagging platform, sound validation (N=50), main experiment N=109 and qualitative interviews N=9 compare points and badges displayed visually, auditorily, or both using tag count, Intrinsic Motivation Inventory and Activity Flow State scale. Visual elements produce significantly more tags while auditory alone does not change tag quantity but shifts flow measures; sounds can confuse or annoy when frequent and visuals distract from image tagging. Combining both reduces those weaknesses and yields higher flow and participant preference. visual increases tagging performance auditory alone alters flow not output audiovisual gives best flow and clarity
AI-written summary · about
related talks
17mFactors to Consider for Tailored Gamification
19mAccessible Maps for the Blind: Comparing 3D Printed Models with Tactile Graphics
11mA Comparison of Cooperative and Competitive Visualizations for Co-located Collaboration
06mInvestigating the Effect of Sensory Concurrency on Learning Haptic Spatiotemporal Signals
26mAuraCast: A Multisensory Proof-of-Concept to Combat Alert Fatigue in Cybersecurity
08mVirtual Objects as Spatial Cues in Collaborative Mixed Reality Environments: How They Shape ...
39mMake me Pretty
09mgames teach you UX