Ariadne: Navigating through the Labyrinth of Data-Driven Customization...
summary
Ariadne performs static analysis on decompiled ROMs to build an AC dependency graph that models framework data holders and their relations, propagates access-control annotations using quantified reduction factors, and flags APIs whose enforced permissions are weaker than inferred ones. Applied to AOSP plus 11 custom ROMs across Android 8–14, it finds 90 unique inconsistencies, implements 13 proof-of-concept exploits, and identifies 30 unique data-driven AC inconsistencies missed by prior tools while reporting ~97% precision on AOSP.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00Ariadne introduction
- 2:43Understanding access control inconsistencies in APIs
- 7:20Access control inference challenges
- 10:13Ariadne’s static analysis
- 13:50Taint tracking and graphs
- 17:45Propagating access controls
- 20:14Inconsistencies and results
- 22:45Conclusion
related talks
25mHarvesting Inconsistent Security Configurations in Custom Android ROMs...
27mOn Demystifying the Android Application Framework: Re-Visiting Android...
24mDangerous Hare: Hanging Attribute References Hazards Due to Vendor Customization
53mAndroid: He protec, but he also attac
21mDiscovering Flaws in Security-Focused Static Analysis Tools for Android using Systematic Mutation
38mThe State of Mockodile in 2018
40mAOSP customization
36mRevisiting Stealthy Sensitive Information Collection from Android Apps
