Notification in VR: The Effect of Notification Placement, Task and Environment
summary
A 24-participant VR user study implements four notification placements (heads-up display, on-body, floating, in-situ), three tasks (game, learning, problem solving), and three room types, presenting five 15s notifications per 3-minute task while logging missed count, response time, walk distance and subjective presence. Results show HUD yields the fewest missed notifications and fastest responses but highest intrusion and lowest presence, in-situ produces the most misses and slowest replies, on-body and floating perform best overall; no environment effect is found.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Introduction and motivation
- 1:30Study design and methods
- 2:44Task and environment setup
- 4:22Study procedure
- 5:34Results and findings
- 8:33Design recommendations
- 9:41Q&A session
related talks
20mNotifications: Challenges and Possible Solutions
09mThe Effect of Increased Body Motion in Virtual Reality on a Placement-Retrieval Task
15mNotifications: Stakes and Possible Solutions
08mPress A or Wave: User Expectations for NPC Interactions and Nonverbal Behaviour in Virtual Reality
22mVanishing Importance: Studying Immersive Effects of Game Audio Perception on Player Experiences ...
07mActions, not gestures: contextualising embodied controller interactions in immersive virtual reality
08mThe Effects of Hand Representation on Experience and Performance for 3D Interactions in Virtual R...
43mAnnoying notifications don't attract crowds ...