Unmeasured Spatial Confounding
summary
Proposes that unmeasured confounders with spatial structure are identifiable and correctable by exploiting spatial correlation, using a distance-adjusted propensity score that combines propensity distance and geographic proximity (tuned by weight W) and an affine bias correction that models (U,Z) as multivariate normal with a cross-Markov property on the precision matrix. Implements DAPS for ATT and a weighted‑least‑squares plus bias‑correction estimator, proves identifiability on ring graphs, and shows both methods flip implausible naive results (ozone and grocery–CVD analyses) toward subject‑matter plausible null or weaker effects.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (16)
- 0:00Intro
- 1:56Spatial confounding in spatial statistics
- 3:44Unmezoured spatial confounding in causal inference
- 5:47Spatial confounding: What does it mean?
- 7:01Question 1: Spatial causal inference in air pollution research
- 8:31Question 2: Supermarket access and cardiovascular health
- 9:22Distance Adjusted Propensity Score Matching
- 11:05Choosing
- 11:36Balance and distance
- 14:29Potential outcomes
- 15:50Blas of common estimators, and the affine estimator
- 17:58A Gaussian Markov random field construction of the joint distribution
- 19:31Calculating the affine estimator
- 21:08Learning the spatial parameters
- 24:10Effect of poor supermarket access on CVD deaths
- 25:22Conclusions
related talks
01h 02mUnmeasured Confounding and More Recent Developments/Challenges in Causal Discovery
31mSome Attention for Attenuation Bias
52mCausal Matrix Estimation
27mDreadful Frailties in Propensity Score Matching and How to Fix Them
45mMulticalibration, Universal Adaptability and Causality
09mTowards Credible and Effective Data-Driven Decision-Making
11mCausal Inference With Corrupted Data: Measurement Error, Missing Values, Discretization, And...
49mCausal Inference in Complex Systems: Network Interference, Strategic Agents, and Beyond
