Panel Discussion
summary
Argues for concrete procedures: run multiple estimators and report why they disagree, specifically G-formula vs IPW vs doubly robust, publish de-identified data and competing analyses, and prefer independent, well-trained third-party analysts with automated flagging plus human review. Presents marginal confidence intervals for individual users only — no joint CIs yet — and recommends using large observational sets to propose ~5 treatment regimes to test in RCTs rather than trusting a single optimized policy.
AI-written summary · about