Wait, But Why?: Assessing Behavior Explanation Strategies for Real-Time Strategy Games
summary
111 Dota 2 players watch a 10‑minute pro match via a browser platform with an interactive minimap showing 12 event icons; three groups compare no extra info, short interactive text “what” summaries, and curated expert why explanations (experts average MMR 6540, Immortal tier). The group with short what prompts scores higher on a 7‑question multiple‑choice recall task, while the why‑explanation group reports significantly higher mental effort, supporting that what explanations boost real‑time comprehension but why answers are too cognitively demanding.
AI-written summary · about
related talks
08mHow Could They Win? An Exploration of Win Condition for Esports Narratives in Dota 2
12mExplaining recommendations in an interactive hybrid social recommender
22mPersonalized explanations for hybrid recommender systems
37mInteractive Explainable AI
41mIf We Want AI to be Interpretable, We Need to Measure Interpretability
21mBet on Psychology How to Leverage Player Behavior in Ads
59mGPT-4 vs Starcraft II – Strategic Decision Making using Large Language Models
29m"AI-Powered Gamification for the Web"