Tight Hardness Results for Training Depth-2 ReLU Networks
summary
Proves concrete limits and matching algorithms for depth-2 ReLU training: shows single-ReLU NP-hard (agnostic) and NP-hardness for any K≥2 in the realizable case, gives additive-error algorithms running in time roughly exp(K^5/epsilon^2) (agnostic) and exp(K^3/epsilon) (realizable) with sample bounds ~K^4/epsilon^2 and ~K^2/epsilon, and establishes tight ETH/GAP-ETH lower bounds: exp(1/epsilon) tight (realizable) and, under a DkS gap hypothesis, exp(1/epsilon^2) lower bound (agnostic). Assumptions and reductions are explicit and constructive.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (9)
- 0:00Intro
- 2:19Depth-2 Neural Networks
- 4:44Training/Learning Depth-2 ReLU Networks
- 8:19Our Results
- 13:33Hypotheses
- 15:54Algorithms
- 18:55NP-Hardness
- 24:48Running Time Lower Bounds
- 28:56Conclusion
related talks
30mComputational Barriers For Learning Some Generalized Linear Models
01h 03mUnderstanding ReLU Networks Through Graph Problems and Polyhedra
33mProvably Efficient Algorithms for Training Deep Networks
01h 14mApproximation Power
01h 04mRandomized Embeddings and Neural Networks
45mIs Deeper Better Only When Shallow Is Good?
19mOn the Cryptographic Hardness of Learning One-Hidden Layer Neural Networks
59mTutorial: Statistical Learning Theory and Neural Networks I
