Transparency reports.
summary
Panel traces how companies moved from one Google report in 2009 to dozens by 2015, compares Google’s downloadable CSVs with Amazon’s three‑page PDF, and shows law‑enforcement and takedown counts (Google reports ~6,800 removal requests and >46,000 items in 2014). It explains Microsoft’s online transparency hub, the court fight that forced 0–999 ranges for national‑security orders, a journalistic lead that exposed a Riverside judge 40% spike in wiretap orders, and EFF’s who has your back grading — useful if you want concrete numbers, legal hooks and real cases.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (9)
- 0:00Transparency reports intro
- 2:13What transparency reports are
- 4:21Panel format: Arthur Alves
- 16:25Microsoft’s report in practice
- 28:54Smaller ISPs’ reports
- 37:58EFF’s assessment project
- 51:34Q&A on transparency
- 1:00:00Standardizing reports
- 1:10:00Closing remarks
related talks
01h 18mOnline privacy versus freedom of speech. Balancing rights in the EU context.
01h 00mUS And Transatlantic Debates: A New Direction For US Online Consumer Rights.
01h 15mEnforcement of GDPR – A reality check.
43mE-Privacy & GDPR
57mData Protection & Digital Marketing – An interactive networking session
01h 13mRights of access to corporate documentations and the trade secrets defence
01h 16mThe right to be forgotten. European and international perspectives.
01h 14m'We give up -please fix the interwebz'. ...