'We give up -please fix the interwebz'. ...
summary
European courts require search engines to de-link name-based results (not erase original pages) and DPAs provide 13 criteria and demand transparency and stats; Google handles hundreds of thousands of privacy requests while copyright takedowns hit ~345 million notices in 2014. ISPs can face orders to take “reasonable measures” to block content but member states must supply legal safeguards and users need appeal and publisher notification. Panel stresses practical remedies: clear criteria, mandatory notice, and enforceable review.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Introduction
- 3:20Google ruling guidelines
- 13:15Balancing fundamental rights
- 20:37Private infrastructure power
- 28:26Legal framework balancing
- 39:12Legal adequacy analysis
- 54:01Q&A
related talks
01h 09mStrip-searching the internet - upload filters and generalised monitoring ...
01h 16mEnforcing the EU’s Digital Laws Delivering European Tech Policies that serve People...
01h 20mEnforcing EU's Digital Regulations in Court - How Can Civil Society Step in?
01h 12mCOLLATERAL DAMAGES OF ENFORCEMENT – DIGITAL SERVICES ACT, NETWORK ENFORCEMENT ACT, AND LOI AVIA
01h 16mThe role and power of DPAS - Between CJEU and GDPR.
01h 32mEDPS-Civil Society Summit 2018.
01h 00mUS And Transatlantic Debates: A New Direction For US Online Consumer Rights.
01h 13mPROTECTING CONSUMERS IN THE DATA SOCIETY: IT’S THE ENFORCEMENT, STUPID!
