Privacy in computer science education.
summary
Panel argues that computer science curricula treat privacy as marginal (the ACM/IEEE CS 2013 baseline gives about 9 hours ≈ 3% of core hours), pushes PREPARE’s privacy patterns portal and training workshop, and calls for teaching concrete skills: PIAs, PETs, cryptographic building blocks, and measurement methods. Industry claim: personal data has clear market value (WhatsApp sale $19B ≈ $42/user). Practical gaps: engineers lack crypto and system-design guidance, textbooks are missing, and real prices appear online (medical records ~$6, credit cards ~$12).
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Start
- 0:12University of Ulm (DE)
- 5:31Raj Samani McAfee (UK)
- 14:32Jaap-Henk Hoepman Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- 17:50Carmela Troncoso: GRADIANT (ES)
- 28:09Claudia Roda American University Paris (FR)
- 40:10Claudia Diaz KU Leuven (BE)
related talks
40mLessons Drawn From Cybersecurity In The Rise of Privacy Tech
40mCreative Ways to Champion Privacy Engineering Awareness
01h 59mDeep Dive Workshop – Data Security and Data Protection
43mPanel: Privacy Design Patterns for AI Systems: Threats and Protections
16mCache-22: Doing Privacy Engineering with Privacy Standards
16mPrivacy by Design for JavaScript Data Systems
47mDesigning for User-Centered Privacy
01h 15mDATA PROTECTION ENGINEERING: WHAT IS THE ROAD AHEAD?