The EU-US interface: Is it possible?
summary
Panel argues EU and US privacy clash is less about vague values and more about concrete rules: Safe Harbor critique notes a controller/processor mismatch and says adequacy won’t fix state surveillance; Google Spain illustrates free‑speech vs privacy tradeoffs; trade deals like TTIP are a bad venue because negotiations favor industry and secrecy; practical proposals favor supervised market-based regulation and sectoral co‑regulation (codes, BCRs, APEC) to cut compliance costs while letting states keep substantive differences.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (4)
- 0:00Start
- 4:47Margot Kaminski Ohio State University Moritz College of Law (US)
- 40:07Eduardo Ustaran Hogan Lovells International (UK)
- 48:37Dennis Hirsch Capital University Law School (US)
related talks
01h 09mREGULATION OF GLOBAL DATA FLOWS: A STORY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE?
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
01h 11mBetween two commissions: the European Commission meets the Federal Trade Commission
01h 20mThe Transatlantic Debate
45mData Privacy Legislation and the Impact on SRE
37mFreedom of the Internet: Europe and the US
01h 14mTTIP, TISA, CETA: is privacy a commodity for trading?
01h 28mSession 2