US and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
summary
Panel debates a proposed EU law-enforcement directive and a parallel US–EU “umbrella” data‑sharing negotiation, arguing whether the directive forces renegotiation of hundreds of bilateral agreements and whether adequacy should test outcomes or matching rules. Governments cite cross‑border successes like Operation Sunflower: 245 arrests, 120 children rescued to justify information flows; NGOs cite US tools—Section 215, the FISA Amendments, the third‑party doctrine—and lack of an independent privacy regulator, plus secrecy around legal interpretations, as reasons the US must raise standards before seeking lower EU protections.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Transatlantic privacy debates
- 1:52EU-US privacy perceptions
- 6:30EU data protection directive
- 20:24US law enforcement privacy
- 32:33Privacy International critique
- 38:43ACLU privacy assessment
- 48:08Differences and solutions
- 58:15US-EU data transfer agreement
- 1:02:31Fourth Amendment Q&A
- 1:06:46UK communications data Q&A
- 1:10:42Telecom immunities Q&A
related talks
01h 11mImplementing Trans-Atlantic intelligence reform two years from Snowden.
01h 14mThe EU-US interface: Is it possible?
37mFreedom of the Internet: Europe and the US
01h 09mREGULATION OF GLOBAL DATA FLOWS: A STORY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE?
17mEnhancing Transatlantic Data Flows – The Future of Privacy Shield
01h 12mWhat the Schrems decision means in the US and Europe.
01h 09mDATA SOVEREIGNTY: WHAT DATA IS NEEDED AND HOW WILL IT IMPACT TECHNOLOGY?
01h 13mEU-US DATA PRIVACY FRAMEWORK:HOW DOES THE US EO SUSTAIN A NEW DURABLE AGREEMENT?