EU-US DATA PRIVACY FRAMEWORK:HOW DOES THE US EO SUSTAIN A NEW DURABLE AGREEMENT?
summary
Panel examines whether the US Executive Order and accompanying regulations actually deliver an effective redress mechanism under Article 47 and whether necessity and proportionality are meaningfully defined in US law. Details: a two‑tier review exists — a Civil Liberties Protection Officer then a Data Protection Review Court — but independence, removability of judges, secrecy of findings, and lack of binding retention limits survive criticism. Irish DPC has blocked transfers, ordered suspension for Meta and finds the DPF non‑compliant.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00EU-US data transfer challenges
- 3:30EU-US Data Privacy Framework
- 14:57Equivalence and redress in DPF
- 27:46Human rights in data transfers
- 40:34Meta ruling implications
- 56:21Q&A
related talks
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
17mEnhancing Transatlantic Data Flows – The Future of Privacy Shield
01h 09mREGULATION OF GLOBAL DATA FLOWS: A STORY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE?
45mData Privacy Legislation and the Impact on SRE
01h 07mThe European Data Protection Framework Under Review: The Proposed Directive.
01h 11mImplementing Trans-Atlantic intelligence reform two years from Snowden.
01h 15mReviewing intelligence services, data collection and EU/US relations.
01h 17mPrivacy in the EU and US: A debate