ACCOUNTABILITY TOOLS:FROM TRANSFERS TO CROSS-BORDER INTEROPERABILITY
summary
Panel reports concrete practice: BCRs as global compliance program (24-year history) versus CBPR/certification models, regulators eye accreditation and mutual recognition, and Italy begins accrediting certification bodies. Practical hurdles: 95% of transfers use SCCs, Schrems/meta rulings and a cited €1.2bn case make SCC reliance risky, SMEs struggle with BCR granularity, and PETs help but PETs are not a panacea—they cost, reduce utility, and require legal recognition to count as effective safeguards.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (9)
- 0:00Accountability tools intro
- 5:59GDPR accountability foundation
- 17:32GDPR accountability gap
- 22:29BCRs for transfers
- 37:24CBPR certification
- 45:07UK accountability approach
- 53:09Interoperability of tools
- 1:06:11Meta decision impact
- 1:18:29Closing & Q&A
related talks
01h 09mCross border data flow. Where do we stand?
56mBridging Borders: Towards the Interoperability & Convergence of Data Privacy Rules Globally
21mInternational Data Transfers – What's the Issue
05mInterview with Giovanni Francescutti
23mThird Party as Compliance Focus – How to Combine Theory and Practice in Your Enterprise
58mGlobal Data Flows and Perspective – Keynote & Panel
05mEasier implementation of Binding Corporate Rules after eBay's and other recent successes – Tom De Cordier
05m3 questions to – Bojana Bellamy