Academic sessions 2.
summary
Dutch police run ANPR as a sensor network that applies live behavioral profiles (e.g., repeated parking visits to catch canvas-cutters), keeps data only for minutes, encrypts it uni‑directionally and claims revocable privacy on hits; Brussels and Copenhagen maps show public CCTV clustered in commercial hubs and “sensitive” housing, with Brussels’ public network roughly six times larger and plans to link up to 3,000 cameras; German police use central joint files plus link-analysis tools (IBM Analysts’ Notebook style) that turn scattered encounters into persistent suspicion; Ireland v Facebook raises whether EU law reaches parent companies and US transfers.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (14)
- 0:00Intro
- 2:30Jason Brigmore
- 7:33The Dutch Police
- 10:50Approach
- 14:02Findings
- 20:52Copenhagen
- 28:08Results
- 32:07Questions
- 34:27Story
- 41:22Google Spain
- 43:10Facebook
- 47:20Database in Germany
- 51:50Data Visualizations
- 56:15Privacy Innovation
related talks
01h 15mSurveillance And Criminal Law.
01h 12mACADEMIC SESSION 1
01h 11mProactive processing of data for criminal investigations
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
01h 16mThe EU Law Enforcement Directive: Where It Stands Today
01h 12mAdvertisement Intelligence by European Security Agencies
01h 13mLaw Enforcement Directive – Unpacking GDPR’s Little Brother
01h 13mFace Surveillance: Current Status, Future Action.