Neighborhood watch: Towards security self management ...
summary
Panel reports that the UK model has 173,000 schemes covering about 3.8 million households and claims 16–26% drops in residential burglary in watch areas, funded and run mainly by volunteers and backed by local police but resisted elsewhere. Examples include stickered streets, police-redacted crime-postcode feeds, Facebook/WhatsApp groups and DIY Google Maps, a push for citizen reporting apps, plus insurance discounts. Risks documented: stigmatization of outsiders, privacy/data-sharing conflicts, historic fear of snitch systems, and mixed evidence on crime reduction.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (28)
- 0:00Intro
- 3:01Rembrandts Night Watch
- 3:30Broken Window Theory
- 15:06Surveillance
- 17:41Partners
- 18:58Origins
- 20:44Who is watching
- 23:19How do they work
- 24:43Promoting Spain
- 25:17Notices
- 26:04Fraud
- 26:52Crime mapping
- 28:23Surveillance in Europe
- 29:49Privacy infringement
- 30:45Police data protection
- 31:47Australia on camera
- 32:11North Carolina
- 32:26Germany
- 33:02Japan
- 33:41Digital Age
- 34:23Eastern Europe
- 35:04Neighborhood watch
- 46:21Local initiatives
- 47:23New relations between governments and citizens
- 48:15Research in Germany
- 48:50Neighbourhood watch
- 51:02Polkanet
- 54:04East Germany
related talks
01h 15mSurveillance And Criminal Law.
01h 14mAutomatic Face Recognition in the UK: Policy and Practice.
19mDesigning for Civic Trust: An Infrastructure to Help Long Beach Residents Manage Their...
01h 03mPanel: The security paradox. Individual privacy vs digital driftnets
01h 13mFace Surveillance: Current Status, Future Action.
42mQuestions and Discussion
01h 10mSurveillance, Democracy and the State
01h 13mEnhancing privacy and security through technological innovation