Feminist perspectives on privacy and data protection.
summary
A 1500-profile scan and interviews with girls aged 15–22 find a narrow, magazine-style femininity enforced online, with girls asking for audience segmentation tools rather than simple secrecy; advertisers and trackers exploit profiles and consent regimes. A home air-quality monitor (DCT500 blackbox) goes into pregnant smokers’ homes: about one third accept, ~80% complete the logging, and ~11% report quitting, raising coercion and surveillance questions when courts or partners get involved. Calls include technical privacy controls, regulatory limits on profiling, and attention as a facet of integrity.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Start
- 0:13Gloria González Fuster Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- 0:50Anne Roth NSA Inquiry Committee of the German Bundestag (DE)
- 2:13Valerie Steeves University of Ottawa (CA)
- 13:00Heather Morgan University of Aberdeen (UK)
- 24:23Nicole Dewandre European Commission (EU)
- 37:33Nighat Dad Digital Rights Foundation (PK)
related talks
47mDesigning for User-Centered Privacy
01h 15mChildren's privacy in the digital age.
08mPrivacy Is the Price: Player Views and Technical Evaluation of Data Practices in Online Games
01h 04mAcademic sessions privacy and surveillance
59mBeyond the Pink: Data Risks in Femtech You Can’t Ignore
12mAunties, Strangers, and the FBI: Online Privacy Concerns and Experiences of Muslim...
06mFacial Recognition: Understanding Privacy Concerns and Attitudes Across Increasingly
12mNormative and Non-Social Beliefs about Sensor Data: Implications for Collective...
