Citizen security vs. data security ...
summary
Panel argues Europe can use technical standards and pan‑European certification to reduce a fragmented market and ease GDPR compliance, citing a €50 billion security market, ISO uptake (Korea adopting cloud security ISO) and an EC mandate called Mandate 530 to produce standards for privacy and security. Tools discussed are standards, certification, privacy impact assessment, and privacy‑by‑design; limitations include slow consensus, implementation failures (certification gaps) and regulatory choices that bake in cost tradeoffs.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (9)
- 0:00Citizen security vs. data protection
- 3:23CRISP project and market fragmentation
- 10:30Security and privacy globally
- 20:04Legal tradeoffs in security
- 32:52Balancing fundamental rights
- 40:38Good vs. evil in security tech
- 50:12Standardization balancing act
- 1:04:22Standardization challenges
- 1:12:01Closing remarks & Q&A
related talks
01h 16mSecurity meets data protection: risk assessment, standards and certification
01h 12mCYBERSECURITY FOR EUROPE: FOSTERING RIGHTS THROUGH TECHNOLOGY
01h 10mThe state of the art requirement for GDPR security measures.
50mPrivacy Standards in the Context of Information Security
48mCXO PANEL: Security Certifications for IoT Devices
32mPanel: How can Data Protection become a driver for the Data Economy
30mKeynote - An Update on Cyber Security Standards
01h 45mBuilding The Digital Fortress: A Toolkit For Cyber Security.