Data minimization vs personalized computing experiences.
summary
Panel argues GDPR tightens data minimization and purpose limitation while preserving space for personalization via lawful bases beyond consent; regulators push privacy by design and mandatory data protection impact assessments (DPIAs). Cited evidence: Eurobarometer shows ~60% worry about control and ~70% fear secondary use; millions install ad‑blockers. Practical examples test limits: a vendor pushes a security patch to 30 million users without fresh consent and a Wi‑Fi scale begins showing trend charts. DPAs/ethics bodies must clarify proportionality, research exceptions and retention.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Start
- 0:21Marie Charlotte Roques Bonnet
- 8:39Celine Deswarte
- 17:04Mario Guglielmetti EDPS (EU)
- 29:14Jules Polonetsky
- 50:15Vesela Gladicheva
related talks
47mDesigning for User-Centered Privacy
37mThe balance between data privacy and user experience
34mThe ethics of data: Privacy vs. personalization
13mRethinking Data Minimization from a User-Centered Approach: A Paradigm Shift
29mDPIA in practice typical hurdles and remedies
01h 14mSenior Academic Session I
32mPanel: How can Data Protection become a driver for the Data Economy
01h 16mUsers' control over their data: is prior consent the best way to monitor.