Cross Border data requests for law enforcement in the post-Snowden era.
summary
Cross border criminal data access relies on a slow MLAT workflow that providers say can take close to a year while courts and ministers report a thousandfold rise in requests. US law bars disclosure of content to foreign authorities so companies either refuse or use ad hoc voluntary transfers of noncontent. Investigators file metadata requests in the hundreds of thousands annually and governments push data localization and extraterritorial bills. Proposals include a treaty or a visa‑waiver style regime with judicial authorization, proportionality and transparency as entry criteria.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (13)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:47Peter Swire
- 5:25Erin Allbaugh
- 13:05The problem
- 17:50The key challenge
- 23:40Privacy rights
- 29:43Metadata
- 37:06Council of Europe
- 41:35Privacy and civil liberties
- 43:11International solution
- 46:06Due process
- 51:26Best strategy for privacy protection
- 53:55Privacy standards
related talks
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
01h 09mCross border data flow. Where do we stand?
12mBetween Court Orders and Platform Policies: Understanding Law Enforcement and Meta...
22mTransatlantic Data Flows
01h 12mACADEMIC SESSION 1
01h 15mTHE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO POLICE DATABASES
01h 09mREGULATION OF GLOBAL DATA FLOWS: A STORY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE?
01h 09mBalancing Privacy, Security and Public Safety