Academic sessions on data protection law and privacy
summary
Article 39 claims to deliver certification that will show accountability and transparency but the draft is overly detailed and process‑bound, creating diverging accreditation, public/private competition and little operational benefit — historical uptake is tiny (20–30 companies certified in four years). IoT work maps a concrete supply‑chain problem with four roles — controllers processors integrators suppliers — and shows subsystem engineering lacks purpose/context. GDPR shifts toward risk regulation via DPIAs (likelihood/severity) and the victims directive forces extensive personal profiling with unresolved storage and assessor questions.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Start
- 17:37What Is the Privacy Injury Framework
- 19:47Issues on Iot
- 28:11Research Questions
- 33:15The Risk Present in the Data Protection Directive
- 34:53The Data Production Impact Assessment
- 40:39Conclusion
- 42:28Protection of Privacy of Victims
- 43:27The Data Protection Directive for Police and Acrimony and Criminal Justice Sector
- 46:29Victims Directive
- 50:49Victim Directive
related talks
01h 15mAcademic Session I The GDPR within a continuously reforming digital environment
01h 16mSecurity meets data protection: risk assessment, standards and certification
22mPanel Discussion – 17 months of GDPR experience – Should we review?
01h 14mSenior Academic Session I.
32mPanel: How can Data Protection become a driver for the Data Economy
01h 14mSenior Academic Session I
46mGDPR: A Global View
43mE-Privacy & GDPR