~/talk

DevSecOps: Five Common Mistakes

Talkat Codemotion Amsterdam 2018 · 2018-05-08..05-09· [security, devops-and-delivery]
links:none on file
slides:none on file

Five recurring mistakes: skipping security-by-design and missing security acceptance criteria; undertraining devs so they patch symptom strings instead of root causes; ignoring thousands of third‑party flaws; and treating scanner output with incoherent priorities. The remedy shown is concrete: add security acceptance tests, appoint a security champion, run dependency checks like OWASP dependency-check and npm audit and automated scanners such as ZAP and nmap in CI; automation cuts noisy manual pentests and lets security focus on true high‑risk findings.

AI-written summary · about

  1. 0:00Introduction
  2. 1:49Why DevSecOps matters
  3. 4:42Security is everyone's job
  4. 5:08Mistake 1: No security design
  5. 9:29Mistake 2: Lack of education
  6. 11:24Mistake 3: Ignoring vulnerabilities
  7. 16:18Mistake 4: Misaligned priorities
  8. 18:57Mistake 5: Security in CI/CD
  9. 25:29Conclusion and management role
  10. 26:56Q&A
~/search
type to search 6,249 conferences, 138,987 speakers and 185,172 talks
~/help
cmdctrl k
search every conference, speaker and series
/
focus the filter search
h
home
c
conferences
s
speakers
e
series
t
light / dark — the status bar button does the same
?
this help
esc
close this, then clear every filter — or just the search, while you are typing in it

Ignored while you are typing. Pages without a filter rail have no search to focus.