The Benchmarks Game: Why It's Rigged and How You Can (Really) Win
summary
Benchmarks control billions and the talk exposes three concrete cheat codes: Cherry-picking comparisons with xAI's Grok‑3 graphs, Buying privileged access via OpenAI funding FrontierMath, and Optimizing for style over substance as Meta submitted 27 Llama‑4 variants to LM Arena. Claims include 39% of score variance explained by style, consensus‑64 hiding cost tradeoffs, and cases where charming but wrong outputs beat correct ones. The proposed remedy is a 5‑step, production‑focused evaluation loop and open transparent test sets.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (4)
related talks
23mThe Art & Science of Benchmarking Agents
20mAgentic Evaluations at Scale, For Everybody
30mPanel Discussion: Are We Measuring Intelligence or Just Benchmarks?
31mPanel Discussion: Beyond the Leaderboard...
19mAI's Infinite Game
54mKeynote: Can you trust your (large language) model?
18mCoding Evals: From Code Snippets to Codebases
01h 05mCan you trust your (large language) model?
