Budget-Smoothed Analysis for Submodular Maximization
summary
Paper introduces budget-smoothed analysis where an adversary picks a worst-case submodular function and the budget is sampled from a fixed distribution, gives a nonconvex program to compute optimal expected approximation, and proves greedy is optimal in expectation among polynomial-time algorithms. Numerical solves show greedy often beats 1−1/e, e.g. about 67% on candidate-budget data, while a robust hardness rules out >90% for any budget distribution.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (16)
- 0:00Intro
- 0:18Motivating application: getting friends to vote
- 0:44Monotone submodular functions
- 1:27Monotone submodular maximization
- 3:40What about the missing?
- 4:19Beyond-worst-case submodular functions
- 5:54Our approach: from an overlooked object
- 6:27Motivation in practice: robustness
- 7:41Motivation in theory: performance
- 8:14Therefore, we're interested in
- 9:19Our model: budget-smoothed analysis
- 12:06Our results
- 14:54In hindsight
- 16:07Budget-smoothed analysis as beyond-worst-case performance test
- 18:23Optimal procurement auction
- 19:12Takeaway
