~/talk

Counting and Sampling Traces in Regular Languages

Talkat POPL 2026 · 2026-01-11..01-17
links:none on file
links:none on file
links:none on file
slides:none on file

Problem: count Mazurkiewicz traces of length n that intersect a regular language presented as an m‑state automaton; hardness: exact counting is #P‑hard already for deterministic automata. Main claims: a polynomial‑time randomized approximation (FPRAS) and an almost‑uniform sampler (FPAUS) for traces. Key techniques: unroll the automaton into layered acyclic graph, use union‑of‑sets estimators with canonical representative samples and a polynomial‑time membership predictive test. Complexity depends on the independence width γ; sample sets stay polynomial (roughly quadratic) and the algorithm proves they do not blow up.

AI-written summary · about

  1. 0:00Introduction
  2. 1:24Sharp NFA modulo equivalence
  3. 6:03Model checking applications
  4. 8:32Hardness of exact counting
  5. 10:17Approximate counting for words
  6. 12:05FPRAS for word counting
  7. 16:40Counting traces instead of words
  8. 20:11Variance in trace sampling
  9. 21:58Main result and conclusion
  10. 22:18Q&A
~/search
type to search 6,249 conferences, 138,987 speakers and 185,172 talks
~/help
cmdctrl k
search every conference, speaker and series
/
focus the filter search
h
home
c
conferences
s
speakers
e
series
t
light / dark — the status bar button does the same
?
this help
esc
close this, then clear every filter — or just the search, while you are typing in it

Ignored while you are typing. Pages without a filter rail have no search to focus.