~/talk

Stability and Convergence Trade-Off of Iterative Optimization Algorithms

name:Bin Yu
links:none on file
slides:none on file

Paper proves a quantitative trade-off between algorithmic stability and optimization convergence, using jackknife-style data perturbations, Le Cam minimax lower bounds and empirical plots on logistic regression. Stability upper bounds show stability scales linearly with T for gradient descent but scales as T^2 for Nesterov/accelerated and heavy‑ball (quadratic or piecewise‑quadratic losses), so early stopping choices differ: T ≈ √n for GD versus T ≈ n1/4 for accelerated methods to reach the same estimation error. Empirically stability tracks test error on large problems while uniform bounds do not.

AI-written summary · about

  1. 0:00Intro
  2. 1:24Stability of Knowledge
  3. 2:37Stability Principle
  4. 4:54Iterative Learning Algorithms
  5. 6:58Supervised Learning Setting
  6. 7:51Excess Risk Decomposition
  7. 9:53Generalization error bounds
  8. 10:51Algorithmic stability
  9. 11:20Main Results (Tradeoff)
  10. 12:27Convergence Rate and Stability Rate
  11. 12:40Tradeoff for GD and NAG
  12. 15:14Convergence Lower Bound
  13. 16:01Types of Lower Bound
  14. 16:58Case study: Gradient Descent
  15. 17:44Stability and Convergence Trade-off under Convex Smooth Loss
  16. 18:09Outline
  17. 19:36Stability vs. Uniform Convergence
  18. 20:18Small-scale Logistic regression
  19. 21:42Large-scale Logistic regression
  20. 23:18Summary
~/search
type to search 6,249 conferences, 138,987 speakers and 185,172 talks
~/help
cmdctrl k
search every conference, speaker and series
/
focus the filter search
h
home
c
conferences
s
speakers
e
series
t
light / dark — the status bar button does the same
?
this help
esc
close this, then clear every filter — or just the search, while you are typing in it

Ignored while you are typing. Pages without a filter rail have no search to focus.