ISO C++ Standards Committee Panel Discussion
summary
Panelists state concrete outcomes and pain points: C++23 lands import std so the standard library becomes a module, modules adoption shows much faster builds, and parallelism work lives in a parallelism TS for prototyping; the committee removes long‑broken features like auto_ptr and deprecates bad defaults such as default capture of this; volunteers number about ~1000 regular contributors and meetings run hybrid with most of the C++23 cycle done online; missing pieces called out are a package manager and stronger static analysis to enforce core guidelines.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (13)
- 0:00Committee introduction
- 12:57Learning from other languages
- 17:33Deprecating features
- 24:33Improving collaboration
- 33:08C++ complexity and education
- 40:38Volunteer efforts
- 44:33Standardizing education and tooling
- 50:07Managing advanced features
- 1:03:48C++23 modules impact
- 1:07:02Cleanup efforts
- 1:11:59C++ evolution future
- 1:16:56Proposals and library standards
- 1:20:05C++ in embedded systems
related talks
01h 32mC++ Standards Committee - Fireside Chat Panel
01h 07mWhat the committee did next!
01h 09mThe Committee Experience
01h 29mGrill the Committee
39mFireside Chat
01h 09mThe Beman Project: Bringing C++ Standard Libraries to the Next Level
01h 22mC++ ecosystem: For better, for worse
03mThe Beman Project: Testing C++ Library Proposals Before Standardization
