Simple Yet Efficient Estimators For Network Causal Inference...
summary
Shows that under a heterogeneous linear outcomes model the total treatment effect reduces to a population mean of per-node “influences,” so a plain Bernoulli randomized assignment (marginal probability p) plus an inverse‑propensity/Horvitz–Thompson style estimator is unbiased and computationally trivial even without graph knowledge. Key quantitative claim: estimator variance scales like D^2/(p n) (D = node degree), and extensions cover low‑degree polynomials or the unknown‑baseline case (which then needs more graph info).
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Intro
- 1:45Randomized Experiment (A/B Testing)
- 4:46Challenge of Network Interference
- 7:07Potential Outcomes Model
- 8:46Simple first attempt
- 12:02Brief Literature Review
- 16:14Preview of Result
- 18:02Heterogeneous Linear Outcomes Model
- 21:37Total Treatment Effect with baseline estimates
- 24:29Reduction to estimating population mean
related talks
30mCausal Estimands And Interventions
49mCausal Inference in Complex Systems: Network Interference, Strategic Agents, and Beyond
01h 11mStatistical Limits of Causal Inference
33mExplainable causal inference results
57mA New Perspective on High-Dimensional Causal Inference
30mCounterfactual Inference For Sequential Experiment Design
31mLearning And Testing Causal Models: A Property Testing Viewpoint
24mA Friendly Introduction To Causality
