Can Non-Convex Optimization be Robust?
Talkat Robust and High-Dimensional Statistics (Simons Institute workshop, 2018) · 2018-10-29..11-02·
summary
Shows that if an unknown smooth objective F is pointwise close to an accessed function f with error nu ≤ O(ε^{3/2}/(√ρ · d)) then convolving f with a Gaussian and running a two-query stochastic gradient estimator finds an ε-second-order local minimum of F in polynomial time; a matching lower bound proves larger nu (by ~log^2 d) forces exp(log^2 d) queries. For matrix completion under a semi-random adversary, a polynomial-time spectral reweighting preprocessing (using graph spectral sparsification tools) produces a weighted nonconvex objective with no bad local minima.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (15)
- 0:00Intro
- 1:47Why is non-convex optimization "easy"?
- 5:00Locally optimizable functions
- 6:36What happens when assumptions fail?
- 13:53Robust non-convex optimization with perturbed objective
- 16:02Motivation: Empirical Risk vs. Population Risk.
- 21:52Idea: Smoothing
- 26:42Properties of Smoothing
- 28:52Ideas of the Lower Bound
- 31:06Matrix Completion
- 34:39Semi-Random Adversary
- 37:03Counter Examples
- 38:16Preprocessing
- 40:44Summary
- 41:12Open Problems
related talks
46mSmooth Nonconvex Min-Max Optimization
01h 01mRobustness, Stochastics, Uncertainty 2
09mConvex Programs, Computational Phase Transitions, and Robust Algorithms
29mImplicit Regularization in Nonconvex Statistical Estimation
01h 17mRobust Optimization and Generalization
57mComputationally Efficient Alternatives to Nonconvex-Nonconcave Min-Max Optimization
42mOptimization Crash Course
35mOnline Optimization and Learning Under Long-Term Convex Constraints and Objectives
