Robust Optimization and Generalization
summary
A production LP with tiny input shifts (about 0.5%–2%) shows losses of 15%–20% when reusing the same plan; a robust LP that enforces rowwise perturbations certifies at most ~6% loss. Chance constraints get a convex safe approximation via the hinge/perspective transform, giving CVaR as the tight surrogate and analyzable SOCP penalties like sqrt(sum Ui^2 xi^2)·sqrt(2 log(1/δ)). Distributionally robust sets (Wasserstein balls) recover familiar regularizers and offer provable but sometimes conservative generalization certificates.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00Robust optimization intro
- 1:31Classical robust foundations
- 28:52Robust linear programming
- 42:31Chance constrained techniques
- 57:55Portfolio optimization
- 1:00:44Distributionally robust overview
- 1:13:18Key takeaways
- 1:15:05Q&A
related talks
34mDistributional Robustness, Learning, and Empirical Likelihood
46mCan Non-Convex Optimization be Robust?
01h 01mRobustness, Stochastics, Uncertainty 2
12mDistribution-Free Robustness
09mLearning Under Requirements
01h 01mRobustness, Stochastics, Uncertainty 1
35mOnline Optimization and Learning Under Long-Term Convex Constraints and Objectives
01h 24mAdversarial Examples
