Better Code Reviews FTW!
summary
Argues that code reviews are for sharing patterns, building shared ownership and faster solutions, not for scorekeeping; presents 10 concrete practices: ask for targeted reviewer input, write small readable PRs, run tests and CI pipelines, use linters/spellcheck and GitHub/Azure DevOps suggestions to automate the boring bits, prioritize quick turnaround and review immediately, favour grading up over blocking authors, and be open for feedback while framing comments as questions and pairing to resolve stalemates.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Introduction
- 3:54Why code reviews matter
- 7:57Be open to feedback
- 13:15Write reviewable PRs
- 18:33Review PRs immediately
- 21:49Avoid feedback overload
- 25:01Accept code quality levels
- 30:24Praise and examples
- 33:37Frame feedback as questions
- 39:02Resolve stalemates
- 42:54Q&A
related talks
49mBetter Code Reviews FTW!
18mHow To Review Someone's Code While Not Being A Jerk!
46mCode Review, you said?
23mDrama-Free Code Review!
17mThe Perfect Code Review
38mImplementing a Strong Code-Review Culture
40mCode Review - How to Do It Better?
41mCracking the Code Review from Guesswork to Automated Guidance
