Hibernates vs. MicroStream
summary
Compares Hibernate and MicroStream for Java persistence: outlines problems teams face with Hibernate (complex ORM, lifecycle, caching, performance) and presents MicroStream as an alternative that lets you design a natural object model without slow ORM layers. Describes that MicroStream removes Hibernate-specific architecture concerns and supports storing data to object storage like Oracle Object Storage or AWS S3.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Start
- 3:02Foreword
- 5:46Hibernate and the Why
- 13:03MicroStream and the What?
- 25:10Time for Code - Differences
- 27:46Hibernate Pros and Cons
- 31:29MicroStream Pros and Cons
related talks
51mRapidClipse Meets MicroStream
50mMicroStream vs. Hibernate: An Empirical Comparison
52mDistributed Object Graphs with MicroStream
50mJava In-Memory Database Apps with MicroStream
50mUltra fast Java In Memory Database Apps and Microservices with MicroStream
53mJava In-Memory Database Apps with MicroStream
01h 00mEclipse MicroStream - Ultra-fast Java cloud-native persistence for microservices
54mEclipse MicroStream - Ultra-Fast Java Cloud-Native Persistence for Microservice
