Active Learning and Human-in-the-Loop Machine Learning
summary
Argues that model gains come more from larger and cleaner labeled datasets than from tweaking algorithms, showing a toy result where error falls from ~13% at 10,000 records to ~8% at 20,000 and ~4% at 40,000 records. Reports noisy labels (feeding 90% accurate labels) hurting classifiers and cites a Kaggle search-relevance contest that climbs from ~30% to ~60% in days then stalls just under ~70%. Promotes active learning and human-in-the-loop labeling to cut labeling cost and rapidly improve accuracy.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (12)
- 0:00Introduction and audience check
- 1:00Speaker background and CrowdFlower
- 2:24Algorithm improvements vs feature engineering
- 5:52Effect of more training data
- 7:36Impact of clean data on accuracy
- 10:55Debate on data cleaning and plateauing
- 15:07Data cleaning and human-in-the-loop
- 16:30Crowdsourced data collection examples
- 21:01Public data sets and Kaggle competitions
- 23:51Human-in-the-loop computing and Active Learning
- 26:40Real-world applications of human-in-the-loop
- 28:50Q&A and closing remarks
related talks
37mActive Teaching, Human Learning
51mEfficient Deep Learning with Humans in the Loop
39mActive learning in the interactive python environment
37mBest Practices for Building AI Datasets
31mReliable Data for Large ML Models: Principles and Practices
33mKeys to Data-Centric AI: Asking AI to Improve its own Dataset.
29mWhy Deep Learning is driving demand for Human in the Loop
37mMachine Learning, The Right Way
