TL;DR: Testing Copy
summary
Asks whether users read and answers that it depends, backing that with cognitive psychology and UX methods: think‑alouds, worksheets, first‑click tests, card sorts, surveys, eye‑tracking and distraction tasks, plus a Redbox study that mixes qualitative and quantitative data. Cites Nielsen Norman numbers (79% scan, 28% of words read) and shows domain knowledge matters more than literacy. Finds that visuals + fewer words improve comprehension, icons reduce specific use errors, and A/B or close tests quantify which wording works.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introduction to testing copy
- 1:50How humans process text
- 10:42Context and comprehension
- 20:15Methods to test copy
- 29:38Case study at Redbox
- 33:09Conclusion and Q&A
related talks
49mEmploying UX Research Methods To Create User-Informed Text
01h 31mVisual Testing: It’s Not What You Look At, It’s What You See
51mReadability & Web: Let's build great inclusive projects
06m“Testing applications for children”
28mCopy That: Helping your Users Succeed with Effective Product Copy
20mReport Design & Psychology (Quick Tips)
40mImprove Your Usability Tests: Learnings From Evaluating 100-plus Usability Tests
46mUsability Testing is easier than you think
