Privacy Communication Patterns for Domestic Robots
summary
Survey experiments show privacy concerns rise with greater locomotion and interaction capabilities (online survey N = 90), then three focus groups generate 86 patterns for camera, microphone, and internet states, and a large online study (N = 1720) ranks them. Clear winners are familiar or physically blocking actions like detaching the memory card, putting a physical camera cover, or returning to a docking station; losers are mismatched or implausible gestures (facing a wall, covering ears, parking against a pillow, or the disturbing “robot kills itself”). An interactive web app helps pick patterns by scenario.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Domestic robot privacy
- 1:52Privacy concerns with robots
- 6:03Communication patterns for privacy
- 9:14Evaluating user communication
- 11:45Key takeaways
- 12:28Q&A
related talks
07mVision: Human-as-the-Unit Privacy Management with AI Agents
01h 17mPrivacy and New Technologies
10mCONFIDANT: A Privacy Controller for Social Robots
05mUnderstanding Privacy Attitudes and Concerns Towards Remote Communications During the
29mAnti-Privacy Anti-Patterns
15m"There will be less privacy, of course" How and why people in 10 countries expect AI...
06mFacial Recognition: Understanding Privacy Concerns and Attitudes Across Increasingly
01h 13mPrivacy, data protection and the internet of things