Panel on Privacy
summary
Discussion focuses on real decisions around contact tracing apps (centralized vs decentralized), mandatory apps tied to services, and a concrete risk: school-issued Chromebooks that snapshot webcams every 30 seconds. It stresses performing a data protection impact assessment early, shows Denmark involved its data ethics council day zero while the UK disbands one, notes Privacy Shield suspension and that fines are a last resort, and recommends starting with one isolated project to build privacy-by-design into workflows within normal budget and timelines.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (13)
- 0:00Introduction to panel
- 1:06Privacy concerns today
- 3:14Digital acceleration impact
- 6:41Contact tracing ethics
- 9:31Privacy in design process
- 12:40Brand value of privacy
- 14:05GDPR and CCPA effectiveness
- 17:16US privacy law gaps
- 19:21Developer challenges in US
- 22:13GDPR compliance risks
- 25:47Embedding privacy workflow
- 28:39Future of privacy outlook
- 30:01Closing and thanks
related talks
47mDesigning for User-Centered Privacy
34mPanel | Future Proofing Data Protection: What's Next?
01h 12mDATA PROTECTION REGULATION POST-COVID: THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE OF DISCUSSIONS IN EUROPE, THE US AND...
28mEmbracing innovation by building privacy friendly apps
17mPrivacy Design Flaws
38mDeveloping Mobile Apps with Privacy as a Baseline Need
51mPrivacy, a relic of the past?
01h 13mAcademic sessions on data processing and privacy