Toolchain Options in 2023: What's New in Compilers and Libcs?
summary
Platform SDK toolchains are often not the best choice — answer: No. 2023 toolchain options show concrete tradeoffs: LLVM provides built‑in cross‑tooling (llvm‑objdump autodetects architectures), binutils/elfutils remain viable, and mold delivers dramatically faster, highly parallel linking for large projects while lacking full linker‑script support. Clang (LLVM 16) is a usable drop‑in vs GCC 13 with typical performance differences of ~2–5% and much faster C++ compile times; musl is ~785KB vs glibc ~4MB; tinycc source <4MB.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Start
- 3:46binutils - LLVM binutils
- 6:05Alternative compilers: Clang
- 13:08Alternative compilers: TinyCC
- 14:17Compilers: BSPS
- 17:07Compilers: performance
- 18:09Compilers: Conclusions
- 19:32Compilers: Multiple compilers are good!
- 26:44libc: bionic (Android)
- 29:53libc: Conclusions
- 30:40C++ support: libc++
related talks
45mCross compilation with clang and LLVM tools.
46mClinging to Clang
31mToolchains for People in a Hurry: Latest Features of GCC/GLIBC
01h 05mTutorial: Toolchains
59mAnatomy of Cross-Compilation Toolchains
54mGCC/Clang Optimizations for Embedded Linux
19mClangBuiltLinux: What's Next?
43mToolchains for the Future
