Law & Order: Corporate Intent
summary
Claims that binding arbitration clauses funnel disputes into a private system that favours repeat corporate players rest on interviews with counsel, a senior policy analyst citing 30 years of empirical research, and a prosecutor describing how outcomes are hidden by NDAs and private hearings. Specific mechanics cited: American Arbitration Association strike lists for arbitrator selection, typical 30‑day opt‑out window requiring USPS notice, and stalled legislation (Fair Act passed House 2019 and 2022 but never voted in Senate). A public case file is posted for review.
AI-written summary · about
related talks
01h 02mPeople, Industry & Government
49mCode as Law
01h 16mSession 1
04mRecent developments on Binding Corporate Rules
01h 06mPanel on Interpretability in the Law
05mEasier implementation of Binding Corporate Rules after eBay's and other recent successes – Tom De Cordier
01h 13mRights of access to corporate documentations and the trade secrets defence
25mEverything Old Is New Again: Legal Restrictions on...