"Stalking is immoral but not illegal": Understanding Security, Cyber Crimes...
summary
Qualitative study with 34 semistructured interviews and a repertory-grid analysis with 18 participants maps how Pakistani young adults label cybercrimes, protect themselves, and fail to report. Findings: stalking ranks as low-severity and is often tolerated, unsolicited contact is the most frequent complaint among women, men worry more about financial fraud, platform controls are bypassed by third‑party tools and UX gaps, and reporting to FIA is intrusive and ineffective. Design fixes include contact-specific onboarding, defaults that lock profiles, and transparent report timelines.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00Research team and motivation
- 1:11Study objectives and demographics
- 2:17Methodology and data collection
- 3:19Cyber crime severity by gender
- 4:25Online protection strategies and limits
- 6:51Reporting barriers in Pakistan
- 9:23Safer social media design
- 10:49Q&A
related talks
12mAunties, Strangers, and the FBI: Online Privacy Concerns and Experiences of Muslim...
27mJavaScript, Cyber-abuse and the Illusion of Privacy
14mTowards Understanding Privacy and Trust in Online Reporting of Sexual Assault
13mUnpacking the Social and Emotional Dimensions of Security and Privacy User Engagement
35mWhere Do We Go From Here? Stalkerware, Spouseware etc
40mWe’re All in this Together: Technology Abuse and Design
47mSecuring Sexuality: Rewiring the Most Intimate Connections
10mDetecting iPhone Security Compromise in Simulated Stalking Scenarios: Strategies and...