Exploring OSPOs and Open Methods in Humanitarian Response
summary
Missing Maps mobilizes crowds to add OpenStreetMap data and produced MapSwipe but MSF could not sustain the project despite broad uptake. MSF standardizes on DHIS2 even though UX and rollout are costly because it enables open data sharing with ministries. DIY PPE designs stayed local because teams lacked collaboration channels and licensing uncertainty blocked sharing of COVID guidelines. Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team gains five years of funding from the Audacious project to realign toward local community first models and reconcile funding with open values.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (19)
- 0:00Introduction
- 0:25Context
- 0:56Medicine Frontier
- 1:11Missing Maps
- 2:55Health Information
- 4:28MSF
- 6:41MissingMaps
- 8:15The audacious project
- 8:42The small humanitarian
- 9:35Where they are
- 10:23Shifting possibilities
- 10:57Missing digital pieces
- 12:34Open source products services
- 12:59Local plus open
- 14:26Local communities
- 15:29A small movement
- 18:02Model resource program offices
- 19:07Open communities
- 20:05Wrap up
related talks
17mFrom Swipes to Solutions: Exploring the Impact of MapSwipe on Humanitarian Response
45mThe OpenStreetMap Project = Data + Community
48mOpenStreetMap - Balancing structure with grassroots mapping
24mFree and Open GIS Tools for Anticipatory Action and Disaster Prep.
55mMind Mapping Open Source Program Offices
32mThe OpenStreetMap Community
25mThe OSPO as a Construct for Global Change
12mThe O'Reilly Radar