~/talk

WebAssembly vs JavaScript: Which Is Faster?

TalkinRussianat OdessaJS 2018 · on Sunday, 2018-07-08· [webassembly, javascript]
slides:none on file

Compares WebAssembly and JavaScript performance by compiling Rust/C/C++ to wasm and running numeric, crypto, image-codec and real web workloads against JS engines. Finds WebAssembly gives faster raw numeric performance and benefits from streaming compilation and binary loading, but cross-language calls into JS are costly; fully native wasm combined with parallel workers yields the best results for image-processing pipelines.

AI-written summary · about

  1. 0:00Introduction
  2. 1:10JavaScript evolution
  3. 3:16What is WebAssembly
  4. 6:50JS vs WebAssembly workflow
  5. 13:54WebAssembly with JS and DOM
  6. 14:15Module load speed
  7. 17:09Compilation speed
  8. 19:17Code execution speed
  9. 27:22When WebAssembly helps
  10. 29:09WebAssembly today
  11. 31:17WebAssembly resources
~/search
type to search 6,249 conferences, 138,987 speakers and 185,172 talks
~/help
cmdctrl k
search every conference, speaker and series
/
focus the filter search
h
home
c
conferences
s
speakers
e
series
t
light / dark — the status bar button does the same
?
this help
esc
close this, then clear every filter — or just the search, while you are typing in it

Ignored while you are typing. Pages without a filter rail have no search to focus.