Ethics in L@S
summary
Panel discussion explains how campuses and vendors handle learner data with concrete frameworks and examples: building a PAR federated dataset that became Starfish retention software, Ottawa-style campus guiding principles (respect, transparency, accountability, empowerment, continuous consideration), use of LMS logs, video/audio and location concerns, and claims that analyses find a gateway STEM grade penalty larger for women. Watch if procedural details, data sources, and mitigation steps (pre-registration, subgroup checks, OSF templates) matter.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Introduction and welcome
- 1:11Panelist introductions
- 3:20Ethical use of learner data
- 15:22Informed consent and transparency
- 21:46Beyond data: systemic racism in education
- 30:10Ethical obligations in research and practice
- 40:03Unintended consequences of AI in education
- 51:02Profiling and support for at-risk students
- 56:01Research guidelines and accountability
- 1:08:47Closing remarks and next steps
related talks
30mArrested DevOps Live...
37mdef tech_liberation(): teaching agency in a programmed world!
01h 14mEthical data handling
01h 13mAcademic sessions on data processing and privacy
32mData Ethics Panel
01h 06mPanel on Interpretability in the Law
05mMedia Portrayals of Student Privacy in Higher Education: A 2013-2023 Review
01h 20mUnlocking societal benefits of AI with privacy protective technologies.
