Micronaut performance
summary
Measured startup time memory footprint class and thread counts and three custom workloads (recursive Fibonacci WAV→MP3 conversion HTTP GET) using Micrometer and Prometheus on an Intel Core i5 with 8 GB and SSD and attempted GraalVM builds. Startup time: Micronaut + GraalVM is fastest in 100+ runs Memory footprint: Vert.x shows lowest usage Spring Boot the highest Results show Spring Boot wins the Fibonacci compute task Micronaut+GraalVM performs worst on WAV conversion but Micronaut+GraalVM is best for HTTP latency Some Graal integration required manual measurements.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (15)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:17Measuring Micronaut performance
- 3:25Benchmark metrics overview
- 5:17Run-up time results
- 6:23Memory footprint analysis
- 7:32Loaded classes comparison
- 8:43Demon threads benchmark
- 9:28Custom method tests
- 13:18Framework performance conclusions
- 14:25Developer experience comparison
- 16:48Micronaut client demo
- 19:06Developer experience value
- 19:53Framework comparison resources
- 20:14Conclusion and next steps
- 21:24Q&A session
related talks
32mUnleash the power of your applications with Micronaut and GraalVM
55mUnleash the power of your applications with Micronaut and GraalVM
46mUnleash the power of your applications with Micronaut and GraalVM
44mUnleash the power of your applications with Micronaut and GraalVM
49mBuilding Optimized Java Microservices with Micronaut 4 & GraalVM
47mMicronaut and GraalVM: The Perfect Combination
52mMaximizing Performance With GraalVM
33mCloud-Friendly Applications with GraalVM