Future of work panel
summary
Discussion centers on concrete practices: a numeric rating table aggregated across many raters to reduce bias, three-to-six-month personal development reviews, and anonymized rollups rather than named scores. Operational metrics exclude no NPS and billing rates for small consultancies. Recommendations include written performance warnings before lawful dismissal, running internal meetups and publicizing open source work to prove impact, giving self-managed teams direct access to financials, and treating AI tools as requiring deep system knowledge to validate outputs.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Future of work panel intro
- 0:28Numeric ratings and subjectivity
- 4:23Measuring front-end performance
- 5:49Manager vs individual contributor compensation debate
- 8:44Agency for junior devs
- 10:33Leadership culture in Finland
- 16:29Making work visible for promotions
- 18:13Supporting shy developers
- 19:38Leadership in self-managed teams
- 21:45Risks of agentic development
related talks
46mPerformance Reviews that Don't Suck
44mPerformance Management: the new team responsibility
44mIncrementally Improving Performance
06mInterview with Rahaf Harfoush
42mEmpowering Individuals with Transforming Performance Reviews
42mFrom talent management to people success
40mPanel: Better Hiring Practices for Fun and Profit
49mFinding potential in your interview processes