National IG experiences - Synchronizing on patterns
summary
Canada and Finland report concrete steps: Canada spends a year and a half engaging IPS 1.10 and uses the G7 patient-summary commitment to drive national adoption; Finland funds HL7 work with ~€100–200k annual budget and a tens-of-thousands-euro project to produce a Finnish baseline. Both expose friction: reprofiling inheritance works for local alignment but breaks across jurisdictional and international layers, tooling does not reliably surface compatibility, and a layered model (national core profile, use-case profiles) is proposed to manage validation and implementation.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Introduction and speakers
- 1:25Canada’s standards context
- 4:12G7 commitment and national work
- 7:02Reprofiling explained
- 8:26Finland’s approach to profiles
- 13:01Nordic harmonization efforts
- 15:31International IG author collaboration
- 17:38Framework for national profiles
- 23:16Challenges in alignment
- 26:10Call to action and next steps
- 27:40Q&A session
related talks
46mInternational Patient Summary (IPS) - Moving from Specification to Implementation
43mGlobal Implementations with the International Patient Access
26mInternational Patient Summary: examples, tooling and exchange
15mSwitzerland on FHIR: learning and success
21mExperiences from the Finnish Kanta PHR Ecosystem
46mPost-Acute Care Interoperability work group - outcomes
42mInternational Patient Summary
22mUnleashing the Power of Health Data