Bounds on qLDPC Code Parameters
summary
Provides geometry‑oblivious bounds on qLDPC parameters by analyzing the connectivity graph of qubits and using the separation profile plus an expansion lemma and the union lemma to build large correctable regions. Claims a tightened separator‑based tradeoff between k and d (previous separator proofs gave k ≲ n/d or k ≲ n/d^2 in earlier constructions; the new partitioning reduces that gap) but still does not recover the Bravyi‑Poulin‑Terhal (BPT) bound. Also shows good codes must contain many expanding subgraphs of size ≈ d whose total size scales with k.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (14)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:06Stabilizer codes
- 2:35Low-dimensional code bounds
- 3:41Quantum code connectivity
- 7:12Correctable regions
- 10:50Partitioning correctable regions
- 11:32Bounds via separators
- 12:56Improving bounds with expansion
- 15:24General partitioning
- 17:32Graph expansion role
- 20:44Tighter bounds via expansion
- 22:08Obstructions from expansion
- 22:50Embedding into architectures
- 24:17Summary
related talks
01h 03mQuantum LDPC Codes with Transversal CCZ Gates
32mTowards local testability for quantum coding
44mNLTS Hamiltonians (and Strongly-Explicit SoS Lower Bounds) from Low-Rate Quantum LDPC Codes
49mCircuit lower bounds for low-energy states of quantum code Hamiltonians
39mExpansion of Higher-Dimensional Cubical Complexes With Application To Good ...
34mExplicit Abelian Lifts and Quantum LDPC Codes
58mLimitations for Quantum PCPs
45mQuantum Pseudo-Randomness From Domain Walls and Spectral Gaps
